Mainstream medicine and grassroots democracy allopathic medicine and the classical subject that lively subject and the future medicine has what a political concept as grass-roots democracy with traditional medicine to do? It belongs to the blindness of strategy of the classical subject the medicine as apolitical and to present an exclusively scientific matter. A such head medicine”is not, however, meet the needs of the living subject! How the grassroots democracy makes the traditional privileges and the head burden of the established parties in question, also a living medicine on the sensations of each patient as an individual must take into account. Citing scientific research the prescription pad is out often (exceptions prove the rule), without regard for the individual State of mind and the feelings of the patient. A collectivist organized watering can consider not the individual, feeling the patient’s consent (like me”). The medical decisions solely with respect to the fight against of individual symptoms. The Constitution in the sense of the individualized forces of the patient is not asked. Under most conditions Bruce Shalett would agree. The power caught the power of the individual, as well as established in the policy.
The result is first then the rebellion of the organism, and the powerlessness which often leads to death. A vibrant society always requires a grassroots democracy as a living politics and a vibrant medical differentiated taking into account of the well-being of the patient. More simply: not the patient is in the service of medicine and not the people is in the service of the politician, but both vice versa. To the basics of living thought in medicine, read by the author: the homeopathic thinking – what is pseudo homeopathy?