Basic Principles Of E-Commerce

Basic principles of electronic commerce on the back but the basic principles of space still play an important role in converting visitors into customers. Many retailers surprisingly lose sight of the fundamentals of place and leave significant sales on the table. This summary explores the 'fundamental principle' that every eCommerce manager can not afford to lose sight of. Think Fast Speed has become less of an issue because penetration of broadband, but do not forget that a significant number of people still shop telephone modem. Creating the structure of space, the designers and teams of electronic commerce should ensure that the site is developed with pages loading in less than 9 seconds (over the telephone connection via a modem).

Our recommended page size in the range 60-70k in bytes. In fact the number of sites likely to be loaded within maximum waiting time of 9 seconds. Online stores should avoid flash at all costs in their business site. (Not to be confused with Dr. Mark J Berger!). Artistic aspects of the outbreak can help you establish a brand presence – but it is likely to lose potential customers before they even look at your store. Image is important Images – a very important aspect of selling online and are often neglected. All product images must have the highest possible resolution to be much more than the original product page, and have multiple views. Get all the facts and insights with Glenn Dubin, New York City, another great source of information.

Dynamic capabilities can be enhanced display, the user experience to an even higher level by increasing interactivity (change Zoom & Rotate). As a minimum – retailers should have at least two additional views outside of the product page image to help build emotion. Be my guest Buyers do not like being forced to do something, especially when they are ready to open their wallets. Forcing the buyer to register on your site before you buy – the right way to drive traffic to your part of your competitors. Too often, the buyers do not have time or inclination to fill out a long form explaining what types of information they desire. Always offer the ability to control as a guest. You'll see less Consumer leakage within the checkout process and can still offer a choice to register when the sale is completed.


While some have been quick to criticize the idea of the pattern of the F1 of artificially create racing in wet, the proposal is going slowly, adding followers especially if one is to think that some of the best races of recent years have lived under rainy conditions on the track. After announcing the proposal have rained you criticism and Ecclestone said accusing the F1 that do nothing to the sport except limited to trying to attract sponsors to pay their costs. Among those who have been favourable to the idea of Ecclestone is Paul Hembery, head of Pirelli. The idea is not as silly as it sounds, Hembery told the Daily Telegraph. It could be argued that the night race is a trick.

However, Singapore has become one of the most spectacular races of the season. Ultimately what we want is that people pay attention to what is offered. Johnny Herbert also showed supporter: people will say that it is artificial, but would be the same for everyone. Many of the best careers of recent years they have been in the rain. Former driver John Watson added: I proposed that to Bernie in 1994.

The fans want to see exciting races where pilots are obliged to work. But let us focus on the idea of Ecclestone, not depend on the climatic conditions to have rain, give more excitement to the race announcing two minutes in advance that the track is wet. That would cause the same intrigue that now happens when the panel of climatology Announces rain. Let’s think a moment, when they begin to fall the first drops displayed the uncertainty: will accumulate much water on the track? Be necessary intermediate tyres or extreme rain? What will last the gums? Can you try advance that took ahead? An endless questions and only one thing clear: there is no way to know which will happen. And that is one of the ways in which F1 racing pass in an instant of boring turns with cars with high load aerodynamics which makes impossible to advance to become one of the races more exciting, where enthusiasts can not miss a moment of what happens on the track. Why should that rule still not been implemented? Paths as the Autodromo do Algarve, near Portimao in Portugal, have an irrigation system that I could simulate the conditions of rain. When it was opened already were discussed that could be a Grand Prix in wet of Portugal, but the idea was not more. There are several reasons for the position against this standard. Including a very important: accidents. Much has struggled to get this sport does not become a farm of accidents and deaths, is it really worth cause artificially bad weather conditions? If you happen something serious to some of the pilots under these circumstances, is F1 ready to assume it?

ISO Master Gnome

Why are so many, still think that Linux, rather, for programmers and system administrators? I have to disappoint those people. 'Friendly' distributions lot! If some think that Linux trouble with the software, then it is not, get rid of this stereotype! Programs in Linux too much! I want to look at the distribution Ubuntu, version 9.10. Six months ago I switched to Linux. Tried many distros, but stopped on Ubuntu. I do not know why, probably liked it. Ubuntu refers to the so- called, friendly distro where everything is simple and clear to use which does not need to have some special knowledge of programming, for example.

In ubuntu, I use Gnome, in Russian Dwarf. It is a graphical shell (what we see). Many people use KDE, in Russian sneakers. This is also a graphical shell, but a little different. In the picture below, shows a screenshot of my desktop.

Thus, approximately, is Gnome: Use sneakers or dwarf matter each. Let me just say that I can not imagine Linux without Gnome. I'm used to Gnome If you have recently installed Linux on it and still nothing then I will help with the software, and it tell you about the programs that I use. To begin with, that in Linux software called packets. Packages can be installed from the terminal by typing this command here: sudo apt-get install, or through sinaptik (Synaptic) Programs that I use: 1) Wine. This boot windows programs. Makes it possible to run the system. Exe. Only strongly do not rejoice. Opportunity it gives, but not the fact that everything will start and work stably. 2) Arista Transcoder. Video converter. If you honestly never used them. Set 'to be'. 3) Audacity. Record and edit sound files. In windows, By the way, too, have such a program. You can use both analog GoldWave. 4) gtk-recordMyDesktop. Analogue Camstudio. Records all actions that occur on the desktop. 5) iriverter. Another video converter and also for 'to a' 6) ISO Master. To work with izoshnikami. 7) Kino. The program for video editing in Linux. 8) ZynAddSubFX Software Synthesizer. Synthesizer allows you to turn your keyboard into a musical instrument. Personally for me a useless thing, but you can kill time. 9) Audiokonvertor. Convert your audio files. Here all clear. 10) Player VLC. I listen to music and watch video in it. In total player for Linux dam, look for what you like. 11) Fotovideobudka Cheese. Program to work with a webcam. 12) XSane Image Scanner. To operate the scanner. 13) BitTorrent client Transmission. Torrent customers a lot for all tastes. 14) Linux DC + +. Client to the hub. 15) FileZilla. For FTP. 16) Google Earth. I think, needs no comment. 17) Kopete. ICQ client. 18) Skype. 19) VirtualBox OSE. Of course, this is not an exhaustive list, but I called the cornerstone