I-KNOW’09 – the know-Center loads to Graz, to ‘Dark side of knowledge management and Web 2.0’ to figure out the five experts. If you are unsure how to proceed, check out cardiologist. Graz, July 2009: The I-KNOW ‘ 09, Europe’s leading conference for knowledge management and knowledge technologies, organized a panel discussion with five internationally renowned professors from Germany, Switzerland and Austria, to explore the dark side of knowledge management and Web 2.0. With such a discussion, we dare an academic initiative to discuss issues like lack of privacy and the transparency of people and information thereby generated. Also in the future Internet will represent a major challenge compliance with this socio technical phenomena\”, so Professor Tochtermann, Managing Director of the know-Center. \”It discuss Prof. Andrea Back (University St.

Gallen), an expert in e-learning and Web 2.0, as well as editor of the prestigious monograph Web 2.0 in business practice\”, Prof. emerit Herbert Kraus (University Graz), Member of the Advisory Board of Schmalenbachgesellschaft and editor of numerous books on corporate management, personnel and organizational management, Prof. Hermann Maurer (Technical University of Graz), longtime Dean of the Faculty of computer science, inventor of the Austrian screen text terminals MUPID, winner of the Austrian Honorary cross for science and art, and Prof. Christa Womser-hacker (Hildesheim University), Professor of applied information sciences, under the technical direction of Prof. Klaus Tochtermann, Managing Director of the know-Center, Austria’s competence center for knowledge management and Professor of knowledge management at the Technical University of Graz. In addition to this Panel discussion the participants in the I-KNOW expect around 30 German-language lectures by experts and experts from companies by APA on Nokia ‘ 09 practice Forum Xohana. So, for example, Mrs Waltraud Wiedermann, GF of the APA-defacto, will speak about semantic search in media archives. Martin Gamboa, Head of retail, Alps-Southeast Europe by Nokia, reported the change triggered by Web 2.0 at Nokia. Herwig Rollett, founder of the Austrian Start-Ups XOHANA, talks about the benefits of Web X.

Metacommunication Communication

1.4. ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF COMMUNICATION. Mailhiot Bernard (1976) cites the following components of human communication: 1. the issuer: takes the initiative of communication and must be able to transmit a message in terms that are understandable by the other. 2. The receiver: it is the one to whom the message is directed, it is picked up as it is psychologically adjusted with the issuer.

The receiver will be influenced by their perceptions, motivations and personal impressions. 3. The message: constitutes the content of the communication, the message can communicate information or affection. 4. Code: consisting of the set of symbols to communicate a message with respect to the receiver. The most common code is oral and written language. 5.

Putting into relief and camouflage: sets of decisions that the issuer must take before entering in communication, in terms of the content of the message and when the code used. 1.5 LEVELS OF COMMUNICATION. All communication implies a commitment which defines the relationship. A communication not only transmitting information but that imposes conduct, according to Bateson, (in Napier, 1975) these two operations of communication are known as: the referential and conativos aspects of the communication. The referential aspect of a message It transmits information. It is the content of the message, it can refer to anything that is communicable, regardless of whether the content is or not valid, true or false. Conation appearance refers to that type of message must be understood that it is, and so it has to do with the relationship between the communicating. This relational aspect of communication is identical to the concept of Metacommunication already defined. These aspects complement each other in each message. 1.6 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE COMMUNICATION. 1.6.1 The group size there is no exact figure about the size of the group. The usefulness of appointing a given number lies in that size is a limiting condition of the quality and quantity of communication.